Comments on: NBA MVP

By: Justin Cady

Justin Cady — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:17:14 +0000

If anyone wants to ignore Jordan’s six rings, that is fine. Ignoring the eleven scoring titles and saying Kobe is the best pure scorer ever is a bit blind though. You might be able to make the case he is the best scorer today, but all-time? MJ is the winner there which is all I was trying to say.

By: bean

bean — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 04:46:39 +0000

dude!!!! that pic is great!!! i just had to leave a comment and let you know that you look angelic in you authentic indian garb!!! hooray

By: airxxi

airxxi — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:26:11 +0000

No one cares what Pedrozo thinks cuz he has no idea what he’s talking about.

By: Choclate Heepz

Choclate Heepz — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:48:14 +0000

X, don’t question my reading and comprehension skills when clearly yours are the ones that are lacking. Note the post right before my last one, “The order Mahtani has is pretty decent, though granted Kobe should be number 2 (despite the fact the he might have the greatest supporting cast around him EVER).” So yes, someone DID say that, and it’s in all caps too.

Let me just say that I believe lebron is a better all around player right now but that kobe is a better pure scorer. That’s really my entire feeling on the subject. I also hate the argument that Jordan has 6 rings. There are a lot of GREAT players in every sport that never win championships.

Also, as a side note, none of this really matters because Pete Maravich is still the best player to have ever played the game.

By: airxxi

airxxi — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:14:43 +0000

28.2 ppg + 7.2 apg > 28.0 ppg + 4.9 apg

By: mark

mark — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:04:55 +0000

what kind of education are your getting at that school. i said if you are comparing two players. let’s say lebron and kobe. if both of them account for the same amount of their team’s points, then they are equal contributors. don’t be stupid with your comparisons.

By: airxxi

airxxi — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:02:21 +0000

Therefore, Mark says every player on every winning team is better than every player on every losing team since all that matters is wins.

By: mark

mark — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:00:48 +0000

it doesn’t matter. if you have more points at the end of the game then the opponent it makes no difference if one person puts them all up or if they are distributed evenly.

By: airxxi

airxxi — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:59:33 +0000

Why does it matter if Wally puts them there is it doesn’t matter who puts them there?

By: mark

mark — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:58:22 +0000

yes, but wally doesn’t put them there. therefore he is not better than nash and your argument just doesn’t apply